The Case for EM Value
October 2024 – For Financial Advisor Use Only
For most of the past 3 years, top-heavy US indices surged while emerging markets (EM) stocks languished, effectively widening the valuation gap between developed and developing market equities to near-historic levels.
Aside from the post-pandemic digital economy boom, which saw US tech valuations explode, EM stocks’ discount to their developed market peers hasn’t been this material since 2005, immediately preceding close to a decade of outperformance for emerging markets.
EM VALUE STOCKS ARE HIGHLY DISCOUNTED
EM has an undoubtedly compelling relative valuation as a broad asset class, and within the non-developed equity universe, value stocks look particularly attractive. Given the cheapest EM stocks are currently offering normalized earnings yields north of 11% versus 2% for the most expensive names, we believe this is precisely where investors can source the highest risk-adjusted long-term returns.
Perhaps because developing nations often post higher GDP growth rates than their developed peers, many market practitioners view EM investing as a growth story; however, the value approach has proven far superior over time, as evidenced by the risk-adjusted return metrics segregated by valuation quintiles shown below.
WHY EM + VALUE IS A WINNING COMBINATION
Higher-beta emerging markets understandably endure more frequent bouts of volatility, but offer amplified return potential for value investors. We believe this is due to four key factors:
- Psychology – Investors tend to exaggerate the significance of near-term problems, effectively discounting the potential for business, industry, management, currency, or macroeconomic improvements over time. Active value managers, like ourselves, exploit these overly emotional responses, which are more prominent in emerging markets.
- Earnings power – Despite the lack of empirical evidence, investors often inextricably link stock markets to economies, associating GDP growth with higher equity returns. When growth-seeking investors don’t achieve the quick gains they’re looking for, their reaction to disappointment can present a fertile hunting ground for disciplined value investors.
- Wide range of outcomes – The array of political and legal structures, currencies, and governance practices each add to the complexity of EM investing, offering robust opportunities across a large pool of stocks.
- Underexploited – Most investment managers tend to favor macroeconomic or quantitative approaches to EM investing, resulting in crowded trades and wider market swings that result in exploitable price dislocations.
These factors are ever-present in emerging markets, and we find the situations they create – sometimes deemed “uninvestable” by market prognosticators – intriguing. They create opportunities to purchase stocks with low expectations, at attractive valuations, and we firmly believe valuation is the single best determinant of long-term outperformance in any geography. Value works particularly well in EM because these valuation opportunities are more prevalent, rendering the growth style less effective.
As shown below, over approximately the past three decades, the five-year rolling returns for deep value stocks outpaced the market 76% of the time, resulting in average annualized outperformance of 7.8%. Because risk mitigation is top of mind for many EM investors, we analyzed the performance data throughout different market conditions and discovered that even in down markets, the cheapest quintile meaningfully outperformed. This illustration demonstrates what our research has shown more broadly: following extreme periods of market stress, deep value stocks have historically tended to outperform by a wide margin.
We can also assess EM performance by analyzing Kenneth R. French data, which segregates monthly EM stock returns (equal-weighted) into six buckets of market cap and valuation (price-to-book). Below are the annualized returns for each bucket, compounded monthly, from July 1989 through March 2024. The data clearly shows that over the last ~35 years, value stocks in emerging markets have maintained a sizable performance advantage across the market cap spectrum.
IS EM INVESTING A LEVERAGE PLAY?
It’s worth noting that EM-domiciled companies aren’t necessarily riskier than developed market businesses from a corporate leverage standpoint. Debt levels vary by industry and business model, but in aggregate at the index level, EM companies are 0.89x levered (net debt/EBITDA as of June 2024), compared to 1.64x for US-domiciled names (Source: FactSet, MSCI EM, MSCI USA, Pzena analysis). More than half of our non-financial portfolio companies have net cash positions on their balance sheets, i.e., no net debt, and our strategy’s weighted average leverage ratio (non-financial companies) is effectively zero.
EXPLOITING EM OPPORTUNITIES
Historical data shows a discernible long-term performance advantage for EM value stocks, and we believe a targeted, research-driven, active strategy is crucial to generating long-term alpha. Emerging markets are inherently disparate, with each country possessing unique risks. The Pzena Emerging Markets Focused Value portfolio, for example, is currently invested in 20 countries, reflecting a diverse opportunity set. Whether fear-induced selloffs are driven by geopolitical tensions, commodity price inflation, or exogenous events such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the resulting volatility often presents opportunities for disciplined value investors.
China has recently become the largest hunting ground for value. Incessant negative headlines have prompted selloffs in many outstanding Chinese franchises, despite these companies displaying solid financial performance. This has resulted in a large subset of Chinese value stocks offering financial metrics comparable to EM peers at far less demanding valuations.
As Chinese valuations have collapsed over the last few years, we’ve selectively increased our exposure to stocks we believe have been indiscriminately sold off due to temporary geopolitical and macroeconomic headwinds.
This group includes Haier Smart Home, an appliance manufacturer (owner of GE Appliances) that generates just over half of its sales outside of China; Alibaba, the e-commerce giant with a host of valuable ancillary businesses, trading at a discount of approximately 75% to US counterpart Amazon; Weichai Power Co., China’s leading diesel engine OEM with economies of scale, best-in-class technology, and proven pricing power; China Overseas Land & Investment (COLI), a state-owned property developer with a formidable balance sheet, superior scale, and a discernable funding cost advantage, which is primarily exposed to tier 1 & 2 cities; and Tencent, China’s largest internet company, with strong franchises in gaming, advertising, and payments, whose management team is focused on expense reduction and monetizing its $120+ billion investment portfolio.
EM selloffs can be severe, leading to share prices that decouple from the broad index, and often creating an asymmetric risk/reward profile. Individual countries, however, do generally recover, and good businesses find ways to navigate crises. As valuation-focused investors, we see these collapsing stock prices as compelling opportunities to begin deep fundamental company-level research, seeking to identify strong franchises unduly punished by a sweeping reaction to temporary issues.